1. Time Complexity: This measures the amount of time an algorithm takes to complete as a function of the length of the input. It is often expressed using Big O notation, which describes the upper bound of the running time.

2. Space Complexity: This refers to the amount of memory space required by the algorithm as a function of the input size. Like time complexity, it can also be expressed in Big O notation.

3. Correctness: An algorithm must correctly solve the problem for all possible valid inputs. This includes ensuring that the output is accurate and meets the expected requirements.

4. Finiteness: An algorithm must terminate after a finite number of steps. It should not run indefinitely.

5. Generality: An algorithm should be applicable to a broad set of problems, not just a specific instance.

6. Effectiveness: Each step of the algorithm must be sufficiently basic that it can be performed in a finite amount of time, ensuring that the algorithm can be executed practically.

7. Robustness: This measures how well an algorithm can handle unexpected or erroneous inputs without failing.

1. Input Size: The larger the input size, the more time an algorithm may take to process it. Time complexity is often expressed as a function of the input size, typically denoted as n .

2. Algorithm Design: Different algorithms for the same problem can have vastly different time complexities. For example, sorting algorithms like QuickSort and Bubble Sort have different efficiencies, impacting their performance based on the input size.

3. Data Structures Used: The choice of data structures can significantly affect the time complexity. For instance, using a hash table can lead to average-case constant time complexity for lookups, while using an array may lead to linear time complexity.

4. Operations Count: The number of operations performed by the algorithm directly influences its time complexity. This includes basic operations like comparisons, assignments, and arithmetic operations.

5. Best, Average, and Worst Cases: The time complexity can vary based on the nature of the input. An algorithm may have different complexities for the best-case, average-case, and worst-case scenarios, impacting its overall efficiency.

6. Recursion Depth: For recursive algorithms, the depth of recursion can affect time complexity. Each recursive call adds overhead, and algorithms with deep recursion may have higher time complexity.

7. Constant Factors and Lower Order Terms: While Big O notation captures the growth rate of time complexity, constant factors and lower order terms can also influence the actual running time, especially for smaller input sizes.

• Algorithm: A sequence of instructions for solving a problem.

• Time Complexity: Measures the time an algorithm takes to run as a function of the input size, expressed in Big O notation.

• Space Complexity: Measures the memory space required by an algorithm as a function of the input size, also expressed in Big O notation.

• Set: A collection of distinct elements (e.g.,
  ).

• Relation: A subset of the Cartesian product of two sets (e.g.,
  ).

• Function: A relation where each input from the domain is associated with exactly one output in the codomain (e.g.,
  ).

1. Addition: Vectors can be added together by placing them head-to-tail and drawing a new vector from the tail of the first vector to the head of the last vector. Vector addition is commutative and associative.

2. Subtraction: Subtracting one vector from another is equivalent to adding the negative of the second vector to the first vector.

3. Scalar Multiplication: A vector can be multiplied by a scalar (a real number) to change its magnitude. The direction of the vector remains the same if the scalar is positive, and it reverses if the scalar is negative.

4. Dot Product (Scalar Product): The dot product of two vectors is a scalar quantity obtained by multiplying the magnitudes of the vectors and the cosine of the angle between them. It is denoted by
   or
   . The dot product is commutative and distributive over vector addition.

5. Cross Product: The cross product of two vectors is a vector quantity obtained by multiplying the magnitudes of the vectors, the sine of the angle between them, and a unit vector perpendicular to both vectors. It is denoted by
   . The cross product is not commutative and is distributive over vector addition.

6. Magnitude (Length): The magnitude of a vector is the length of the vector, which can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem. It is denoted by
   or
   .

7. Unit Vector: A unit vector is a vector with a magnitude of 1. It is used to represent the direction of a vector without considering its magnitude. A unit vector in the direction of vector
   is denoted by
   .

8. Projection: The projection of one vector onto another is the component of the first vector in the direction of the second vector. It is calculated by taking the dot product of the two vectors and dividing by the magnitude of the second vector.

1. Addition: Two matrices of the same dimensions can be added together by adding their corresponding elements.
Example:

2. Subtraction: Similar to addition, matrices of the same dimensions can be subtracted by subtracting their corresponding elements.
Example:

3. Scalar Multiplication: A matrix can be multiplied by a scalar (a real number) by multiplying each element of the matrix by that scalar.
Example:

4. Matrix Multiplication: Two matrices can be multiplied if the number of columns in the first matrix is equal to the number of rows in the second matrix. The resulting matrix's element is calculated as the dot product of the corresponding row and column.
Example:

5. Transpose: The transpose of a matrix is obtained by swapping its rows and columns.
Example:

6. Determinant: The determinant is a scalar value that can be computed from a square matrix and provides important properties about the matrix, such as whether it is invertible.
Example: For a 2x2 matrix
, the determinant is calculated as:

7. Inverse: The inverse of a matrix A is another matrix A^{-1} such that AA^{-1} = I , where I is the identity matrix. The inverse exists only for square matrices with a non-zero determinant.
Example: For
, the inverse is given by:

1. Asymptotic Notation: The order of growth is often expressed using asymptotic notations such as:
• Big O Notation (O): Describes an upper bound on the growth rate of a function. For example, if an algorithm's time complexity is
  , it means that the running time grows at most quadratically with the input size.
• Omega Notation (Ω): Provides a lower bound. For instance,
  indicates that the algorithm will take at least linear time for large inputs.
• Theta Notation (Θ): Represents a tight bound, meaning the function grows at the same rate both from above and below.

2. Growth Rates: Common orders of growth include:
• Constant time:
  )
• Logarithmic time:
• Linear time:
• Linearithmic time:
• Quadratic time:
• Cubic time:
• Exponential time:
• Factorial time:

3. Comparison of Algorithms: Understanding the order of growth helps in comparing algorithms. For example, an algorithm with
   complexity is generally more efficient than one with
   for large input sizes.

4. Practical Implications: While theoretical analysis provides insights into performance, actual running times can vary based on factors like constant factors, lower order terms, and specific input distributions.

for (i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
    printf("%d", a[i]);
}

1. Loop Execution: The loop runs from i = 1 to i = n, which means it will execute a total of n iterations.

2. Operations Inside the Loop: The operation inside the loop is a printf statement that outputs the value of a[i]. The frequency of this operation is directly proportional to the number of iterations of the loop.

• Since the loop runs n times and performs a single operation (printf) during each iteration, the total frequency count for the given code is:

1. Selecting the most appropriate algorithm: Different algorithms for the same problem can have vastly different efficiencies. Algorithm analysis helps in choosing the best algorithm for a particular application.

2. Predicting an algorithm's performance: Analyzing an algorithm's time and space complexity allows predicting how the algorithm will scale as the input size grows, which is essential for practical applications.

3. Comparing algorithms: Algorithm analysis provides a framework for comparing the relative efficiency of different algorithms, even if they solve different problems.

4. Identifying inefficient algorithms: Analysis can reveal algorithms with unacceptable time or space requirements, allowing for improvements or alternative solutions.

5. Theoretical computer science: Algorithm analysis is fundamental to the theory of computation, helping determine the inherent difficulty of problems and the limits of efficient computation.

1. Worst-Case Complexity: This measures the maximum running time or space used by the algorithm over all possible inputs of a given size. It provides a guarantee on the algorithm's performance.
Example: Linear search has a worst-case time complexity of
, where
is the size of the input array. In the worst case, the element being searched for is not present, and the algorithm has to check every element.

2. Best-Case Complexity: This measures the minimum running time or space used by the algorithm over all possible inputs of a given size. It provides a lower bound on the algorithm's performance.
Example: Linear search has a best-case time complexity of
, where the element being searched for is present at the first position of the array.

3. Average-Case Complexity: This measures the average running time or space used by the algorithm over all possible inputs of a given size, assuming a particular probability distribution of the inputs. It provides a more realistic estimate of the algorithm's typical performance.
Example: For linear search, if we assume that the element being searched for is equally likely to be at any position in the array, the average-case time complexity is
, where
is the size of the array.

• Best Case: The best case occurs when the item being searched for is at the first position of the array. In this case, the search completes in one comparison, leading to a best-case time complexity of
  .

• Average Case: Assuming that the search key is equally likely to be in any position, the average case occurs when the search key is found halfway through the array. Thus, the average number of comparisons would be n/2 , leading to an average-case time complexity of
  .

• Worst Case: The worst case happens when the item is not present in the array or is located at the last position. In this case, the algorithm must check all
  elements, resulting in a worst-case time complexity of
  .

• Best Case: Minimum time complexity; occurs under optimal conditions (e.g., finding the item at the first position).

• Average Case: Expected time complexity; calculated over all possible inputs (e.g., finding the item halfway through).

• Worst Case: Maximum time complexity; occurs under the least favorable conditions (e.g., item not found or at the last position).

1. Asymptotic analysis allows us to focus on the essential behavior of an algorithm as the input size grows large, ignoring constant factors and lower-order terms. This provides a high-level understanding of the algorithm's efficiency.

2. Asymptotic notations provide a concise way to classify and compare the growth rates of functions that describe the time or space complexity of algorithms. This helps in selecting the most efficient algorithm for a given problem.

3. The three main asymptotic notations used are:
• Big O notation (O): Provides an upper bound on the growth rate of a function. It describes the worst-case scenario. For example, if an algorithm's time complexity is O(n^2), it means the running time grows at most quadratically with the input size.
• Big Ω notation (Ω): Provides a lower bound on the growth rate of a function. It describes the best-case scenario. For instance, Ω(n) indicates the algorithm will take at least linear time for large inputs.
• Big Θ notation (Θ): Provides a tight bound, describing the exact growth rate of a function. It captures both the upper and lower bounds. Θ(n^2) means the function grows exactly quadratically.

4. Asymptotic analysis is crucial for comparing the efficiency of different algorithms, especially when analyzing their time and space complexities. It allows us to determine if an algorithm will scale well to large inputs.

5. Asymptotic notations are fundamental to the theory of computation. They help determine the inherent difficulty of problems and the limits of efficient computation.

ALGORITHM Swap(A, i, j)
    temp ← A[i]
    A[i] ← A[j]
    A[j] ← temp

ALGORITHM ArrayAccess(A, i)
    return A[i]

1. Time Complexity: This measures the amount of time an algorithm takes to complete as a function of the input size. It is often expressed using Big O notation (e.g., O(n), O(log n), O(n^2)) to describe the upper bound of the running time.

2. Space Complexity: This measures the amount of memory space required by the algorithm as a function of the input size. Like time complexity, it is also expressed in Big O notation.

3. Input Size: The size of the input is a critical parameter that affects both time and space complexity. It is often denoted as n, and the performance of the algorithm is analyzed based on how it scales with increasing n.

4. Basic Operation: This refers to the most significant operation in the algorithm that contributes to its running time. Identifying the basic operation helps in estimating the time complexity.

5. Worst Case, Best Case, and Average Case: These terms describe the performance of an algorithm under different scenarios:
• Worst Case: The maximum time or space required for any input of size n.
• Best Case: The minimum time or space required for the most favorable input of size n.
• Average Case: The expected time or space required for a typical input of size n, often based on probabilistic assumptions.

6. Amortized Analysis: This technique is used to analyze the average time per operation over a sequence of operations, particularly when some operations may be costly.

7. Empirical Analysis: This involves running the algorithm on various input sizes and measuring the actual time and space used, which can provide insights into its performance in practical scenarios.

8. Correctness: Ensuring that the algorithm produces the correct output for all valid inputs is a fundamental aspect of analysis.

1. Set Up the Inequality: We want to solve for
   in the inequality
   .

2. Trial Values: We can test various integer values of n to find the smallest n that satisfies the inequality.
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :
• For
  :

1. Asymptotic Analysis:
• Asymptotic analysis focuses on how the performance of an algorithm scales with increasing input sizes. It provides a way to understand the efficiency of algorithms by examining their growth rates.
• An algorithm that is asymptotically faster (e.g., O(n log n) vs. O(n^2)) will eventually outperform a slower algorithm as the input size becomes sufficiently large, regardless of the constant factors involved.

2. Growth Rate:
• For large input sizes, the growth rate of an algorithm's time complexity becomes the dominant factor in determining its performance. For instance, an algorithm with a time complexity of O(n log n) will eventually outperform one with O(n^2) as n increases, even if the latter runs on a faster machine.
• The key point is that while the fast computer may execute the slower algorithm quicker for small inputs, as the input size grows, the asymptotic behavior will dictate that the faster algorithm will outperform the slower one.

3. Practical Implications:
• In real-world applications, algorithms with better asymptotic performance are preferred for handling large datasets. For example, sorting algorithms like Merge Sort (O(n log n)) will outperform Bubble Sort (O(n^2)) as the number of elements increases, even if Bubble Sort runs faster on a specific machine for small arrays.
• The constant factors and overheads associated with the slower algorithm may not compensate for the inefficiencies introduced by its higher growth rate as the input size increases.

4. Example:
• Consider two algorithms:
• Algorithm A with a time complexity of O(n^2) running on a fast computer that can process 1 billion operations per second.
• Algorithm B with a time complexity of O(n log n) running on a slow computer that can process 100 million operations per second.
• For small input sizes, Algorithm A may finish first due to its faster clock speed. However, as the input size grows (e.g., n = 10,000), the number of operations for Algorithm A would be 100,000,000 (10,000^2), while for Algorithm B, it would be approximately 132,877 (10,000 log(10,000)). Eventually, Algorithm B will complete its task much faster despite the slower machine.

1. Prove $f(n) \in O(n^2)$: We need to find constants $c > 0$ and $n_0 \geq 0$ such that $f(n) \leq cn^2$ for all $n \geq n_0$.
Let $c = \frac{1}{2}$ and $n_0 = 1$. Then, for all $n \geq 1$: $$\begin{align*} f(n) &= 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n \\ &= \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \\ &\leq \frac{n^2 + n}{2} \\ &\leq \frac{n^2 + n}{2} \\ &= \frac{1}{2}n^2 \end{align*}$$
Therefore, $f(n) \in O(n^2)$.

2. Prove $f(n) \in \Omega(n^2)$: We need to find constants $c > 0$ and $n_0 \geq 0$ such that $f(n) \geq cn^2$ for all $n \geq n_0$.
Let $c = \frac{1}{2}$ and $n_0 = 1$. Then, for all $n \geq 1$: $$\begin{align*} f(n) &= 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n \\ &= \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \\ &\geq \frac{n^2}{2} \end{align*}$$
Therefore, $f(n) \in \Omega(n^2)$.

• Cost Analysis:
• Inserting an element into the array typically takes O(1) time.
• However, if the array is full, inserting an element requires copying all existing elements to a new larger array, which takes O(n) time.

• Amortized Cost Calculation:
• Let's say we assign an amortized cost of 3 for each insertion operation:
• 2 for the regular insertion (which is less than its actual cost).
• 1 extra "credit" is stored for future resizing.

• Cost Summary:
• For each insertion that does not require resizing, we spend 2 and save 1 as credit.
• When resizing occurs (every time we reach capacity), we use this credit to pay for the O(n) copying process.

• Suppose we perform n insertions.

• The first insertion costs O(1), the second O(1), and so on until we reach a point where resizing occurs.

• If we analyze all n insertions:
• The total cost includes all O(1) insertions plus the costs incurred during resizing.

• Cost Calculation:
• The first n insertions will lead to resizing at logarithmic intervals (i.e., after inserting 1, 2, 4, 8, ..., up to n).
• The total cost can be expressed as:
• Total Cost = O(n) for regular insertions + O(n) for resizing (since each resizing operation involves copying all elements).

• Average Cost:
• If you perform n operations and the total cost is O(n), then the average cost per operation is O(1).

1. Sum: $f(n) + g(n) = n^2 + n^3 = n^2(1 + n)$

2. Minimum: $\min(f(n), g(n)) = n^2$ (since $n^2$ is the smaller of the two for all $n > 1$)

• The sum $n^2(1 + n)$ grows faster than $n^2$ because the term $n^3$ dominates for large $n$.

• The minimum $\min(f(n), g(n)) = n^2$ grows at the same rate as $n^2$.